Books
Black Litigants in the Antebellum American South (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2018)
John Hope Franklin Series in African American History and Culture
Awards:
2019 William Nelson Cromwell Foundation Book Prize, American Society for Legal History
2019 J. Willard Hurst Book Prize for best book in socio-legal history, Law and Society Association
2018 David J. Langum Sr. Prize for best book in American Legal History, Langum Charitable Trust
2019 James H. Broussard First Book Prize, Society for Historians of the Early American Republic
2019 Chancellor's Award for Research, Vanderbilt University
For a series of Legal History Blog posts On Black Litigants, historic preservation, and using local court records in research and teaching, see here .
Hear me speak about Black Litigants with the New Books Network (here) and with Talking Legal History (here).
Hear me speak about Black Litigants with the New Books Network (here) and with Talking Legal History (here).
|
In the antebellum American South, among the sprawling plantations of the Natchez district, in a society in which slavery was deeply entrenched and violently defended, Black people sued white people. They often won. This is a phenomenon that has largely been overlooked by historians. But it ought not to be, because it speaks to the heart of the ways in which we understand the operation of power, of law, and of racial hierarchies in the slave South.
Black Litigants is a historical study of free and enslaved African Americans’ use of the local courts in the antebellum American South. The project investigates unpublished and previously unexplored lower court records from the Natchez district of Mississippi and Louisiana between 1800 and 1860 in which free Blacks and slaves sued whites and other African Americans. My research includes over 1,000 examples of Black litigants using the courts on their own behalf—often successfully. African Americans sued whites and other people of color to enforce the terms of their contracts, recover unpaid debts, recuperate back wages, and claim damages for assault. They sued in conflicts over cattle, land, slaves, and other property, for their freedom and for divorce, and to adjudicate a number of other disagreements. Although they present technical and interpretive challenges, local court records represent an important resource for understanding the relationship between legal systems and formally marginalized peoples in racially and economically stratified societies. In this case they undermine the longstanding assumption that African Americans were legal outsiders. Free Blacks and slaves were not strangers to the courts. They resided at the center of antebellum southern legal culture—as the objects of white concerns about social control and racial hierarchy and as active protectors of their own interests. Their litigation indicates that the legal system was not solely the province of the elite. On significant occasions it could serve it as a tool of the subordinated, even in a slave society. Parts of Chapter 2 were first published in 2015 in the Journal of the Civil War Era. Available here: "Black Litigiousness and White Accountability: Free Blacks and the Rhetoric of Reputation in the Antebellum Natchez District." |
In Progress:
The Stability of Fortunes: Black Americans and Finance in the Long Nineteenth Century
The Stability of Fortunes: Black Americans and Finance in the Long Nineteenth Century
This book project reconstructs the world of Black moneylenders in the long nineteenth century in order to explore categories of property, commerce, citizenship, and rights. While researching my first book project, I realized that debt actions represented one of the most common types of lawsuits initiated by Black plaintiffs in the pre-Civil War Deep South. Moreover, Black plaintiffs almost always won, regardless of the race of the defendant. Of the extant cases from the Natchez district, for instance, African Americans lost only two cases between 1800 and 1860, and two-thirds of these involved a white defendant. At least ninety Black men and women in the region served as creditors. People of color were far more than property and labor in the economy of the slave South; they were also essential arteries for capital, extending large and small loans to both white and other black people. These relationships of debt and obligation speak to important issues related to the development of market capitalism and to the relationship between race, law, and economic citizenship. Thus, my current book project examines Black Americans' involvement in the eighteenth and nineteenth-century credit economy of the Atlantic World (spanning from the Lower Mississippi Valley to Philadelphia, New York, Liverpool, Paris, Havana, and back again).
For sample exploratory articles on free Black creditors, commerce, and law, see “William Johnson’s Hypothesis: A Free Black Man and the Problem of Legal Knowledge in the Antebellum U.S. South, ” Law and History Review, 37, no. 1 (February 2019): 89-124 (available here) ; and “Arteries of Capital: William Johnson and the Practice of Black Moneylending in the Antebellum U.S. South,” Slavery & Abolition, (June 2020) https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0144039X.2019.1633732
For an interview with me about William Johnson, free Black creditor and barber, see The Docket, Volume 2, Issue 1 (available here).
For sample exploratory articles on free Black creditors, commerce, and law, see “William Johnson’s Hypothesis: A Free Black Man and the Problem of Legal Knowledge in the Antebellum U.S. South, ” Law and History Review, 37, no. 1 (February 2019): 89-124 (available here) ; and “Arteries of Capital: William Johnson and the Practice of Black Moneylending in the Antebellum U.S. South,” Slavery & Abolition, (June 2020) https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0144039X.2019.1633732
For an interview with me about William Johnson, free Black creditor and barber, see The Docket, Volume 2, Issue 1 (available here).
Other Research Projects
"Variation in Use of Courts by Legal Status and Jurisdiction"
Principal Investigator
National Science Foundation
Division of Social and Economic Sciences
Continuing Grant 2014-2017
($149,605)
Abstract
"Variation in Use of Courts by Legal Status and Jurisdiction"
Principal Investigator
National Science Foundation
Division of Social and Economic Sciences
Continuing Grant 2014-2017
($149,605)
Abstract
"This project will test the significance of both legal status and jurisdiction in making claims in the courts, comparing across common-law and civil-law regimes. Civil law jurisdictions organize legal claims making differently from common law systems. People who took cases to court varied by legal status. That variation will allow the project to evaluate the significance of legal status in making legal claims, both in process and outcomes. Litigation indicates that the legal system was not solely the province of the elite. Reimagining members of subordinated groups as shrewd litigators will complicate our interpretation of power and will serve as a model for understanding the legal action of other subordinated groups."